问一个被动语态的问题,The photographs of Mars taken by satellite are much clearer than those taken from the earth.大意是卫星拍的火星照片比在地球上拍的火星照片清晰.我的问题是:这是一个一般过去时的被动
问一个被动语态的问题,The photographs of Mars taken by satellite are much clearer than those taken from the earth.大意是卫星拍的火星照片比在地球上拍的火星照片清晰.我的问题是:这是一个一般过去时的被动
问一个被动语态的问题,
The photographs of Mars taken by satellite are much clearer than those taken from the earth.大意是卫星拍的火星照片比在地球上拍的火星照片清晰.我的问题是:这是一个一般过去时的被动语态,为什么两个taken前面没有were呢?
问一个被动语态的问题,The photographs of Mars taken by satellite are much clearer than those taken from the earth.大意是卫星拍的火星照片比在地球上拍的火星照片清晰.我的问题是:这是一个一般过去时的被动
一个句子里面只能有一个谓语!如果taken前面加were了,那么这个句子就不止一个谓语了.这个句子的谓语是are,其他两个taken是做photo的后置定语,就是修饰photo的,什么样的photo,卫星拍下来的photo,原句应该是The photographs of Mars (which are )taken by satellite are much clearer than those(which are) taken from the earth,在这里可省略,被动语态就用过去分词,主动就ing形式的,我解释清楚了吗?有点罗嗦
“俊狼猎英”团队为您解答。
这里的两个taken,实则是过去分词做后置定语,修饰前面的photographs的(这时要省去were)。如果要改为被动语态,则要改成定语从句的形式,即:The photographs of Mars (which/that) were taken by satellite are much clearer than those (which/that)were...
全部展开
“俊狼猎英”团队为您解答。
这里的两个taken,实则是过去分词做后置定语,修饰前面的photographs的(这时要省去were)。如果要改为被动语态,则要改成定语从句的形式,即:The photographs of Mars (which/that) were taken by satellite are much clearer than those (which/that)were taken from the earth.这样的话,were不就出来了吗?
祝你进步!
收起
因为这是一个句子,一个句子只能有一个谓语,后面有个are是谓语
所以taken是非谓作定语修饰photographs
照片是被照,所以用表被动的taken
如果有问题继续追问吧,非谓这块挺难得
O(∩_∩)O~