英语问题（读文章回答）Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always top scorers. But in a recent league table, a European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea was still in second place, though

英语问题（读文章回答）Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always top scorers. But in a recent league table, a European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea was still in second place, though
英语问题（读文章回答）
Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always
top scorers. But in a recent league table, a
European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea
was still in second place, though. Britain was at number 6. What is the secret
of Finland and South Korea's success? Time to do some homework.

In Korea the school day is long - typically 7 or 8 hours, followed by hours
of private tutoring in the evenings. All this
hothousing leaves Korean students so tired, they sometimes fall
asleep in class next day. Worries about the effects of late night
cramming led the government to force cramming schools to close
by 10pm.


Finnish children spend the least time in class in the developed world, often
finishing just after lunch, with about one hour of homework a day.
Private tuition is uncommon. The British school day is quite
long in comparison, around 6 hours, and secondary school pupils do 2 or 3 hours
of self-study a night.

The Korean education system, like many in Asia, is intensely
competitive, with students even competing to get into the best cramming
schools, to help them get ahead. Finnish education is far less
cut-throat. Classes are all mixed ability, and
there are no league tables. British schools again occupy the middle
ground, with quite high levels of competition for places at university,
and schools and universities battling to come top of league
tables for everything from exam results to student
satisfaction.

Korea and Finland both do well, yet their education systems are so different.
So what lessons can Britain learn from these two swots?

Well, there are some similarities in Asia and Finland. In those countries,
teachers have high status in society, and education is very
highly valued. Those attitudes can't change quickly. But it can
be done. They might be the star pupil now, but until the 1970s,
Finland's educational system was poor. Their radically different
approach to schooling has taken them to the top in
just a generation.

问题according to the author ,the key to improving education is
A.The attitude B.new teaching approach
问;为何选A不选B,从文中最后一句话应该很明显看出选B吧?

英语问题（读文章回答）Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always top scorers. But in a recent league table, a European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea was still in second place, though
我看了一下,主要问题是approach to schooling不等于new teaching approach.前者说的还是教育体系的建设问题,没有离开“态度”这个主题；后者则是指具体的教学法,文章中并未说这个是关键因素.
综合全文看,韩国和芬兰这也不同那也不同,但都成功了,唯一相同的就是态度,所以只能选态度了.

额，翻译：
每当有人衡量教育成功，东亚国家总是
射手。但在最近的一个排名，一
欧洲国家，芬兰，是班里的尖子。韩国
还是在第二位，尽管。英国在6号。这个秘密是什么
芬兰和韩国的成功？时间做作业。
在韩国的学校日长-通常为7或8小时，其次是小时
私人辅导的晚上。这一切
温室培育离开韩国学生太累了，他们有时会
在课上睡着了，第二天。...

全部展开

额，翻译：
每当有人衡量教育成功，东亚国家总是
射手。但在最近的一个排名，一
欧洲国家，芬兰，是班里的尖子。韩国
还是在第二位，尽管。英国在6号。这个秘密是什么
芬兰和韩国的成功？时间做作业。
在韩国的学校日长-通常为7或8小时，其次是小时
私人辅导的晚上。这一切
温室培育离开韩国学生太累了，他们有时会
在课上睡着了，第二天。在深夜的影响的担忧
将导致政府力填鸭式的学校关闭
晚上10点。
芬兰的孩子花最少的时间在课堂上在发达世界，经常
午饭后就完成，大约一个小时的家庭作业的一天。
私人补习是罕见的。英国的学校一天很
在比较长，约6小时，和中学的学生做2或3小时
一个自学的夜晚。
韩国的教育系统，像许多在亚洲，是强烈的
竞争，学生即使竞争进入最好的临时抱佛脚
学校，以帮助他们。芬兰教育是远远低于
刎颈。类是所有混合能力，和
没有排名表。英国学校再次占据中间
地面，有高水平的大学的竞争，
学校和大学来的顶级联赛的争夺
从考试成绩对学生的一切表
满意度。
韩国和芬兰都做的很好，但他们的教育体系是如此地不同。
所以有什么经验教训可以从这两个给英国学习？
嗯，有一些相似之处，在亚洲和芬兰。在这些国家，
教师有高社会地位，教育是非常
高度重视。这种态度可以很快改变不。但它可以
做。他们可能是现在的明星学生，但直到20世纪70年代，
芬兰的教育系统很差。他们完全不同
方法对教育采取了他们的顶部
仅仅一代人。
问题：根据作者的观点，以提高教育的关键是
A.态度的新的教学方法
B。新的教学方法
其实，还是应该选择A的

收起

作者的意思还是the attitude。虽然B也很重要。