There is some argument against the whole idea of developing tests to measure a person's Emotional Intelligence.To suggest that psychologists and educators might be able to 1. a person's worth based on a couple of tests is silly.It is simply 2

There is some argument against the whole idea of developing tests to measure a person's Emotional Intelligence.To suggest that psychologists and educators might be able to 1. a person's worth based on a couple of tests is silly.It is simply 2
There is some argument against the whole idea of developing tests to measure a
person's Emotional Intelligence.To suggest that psychologists and educators
might be able to 1. a
person's worth based on a couple of tests is silly.It is simply 2. to
try the impossible task.One is that we haven't even begun to 3. 
the surface of our learning when it comes to the brain.Setting up tests to tell
how far a person gets in life is irresponsible 4. 
our lack of knowledge.Those who measure Emotional Intelligence are attempting
to determine how well a person can 5.
to
particular changes.The questions have been designed according to their own
understanding,and biases (偏差) are inevitable.The world is far too vast to ever
6. 
for even a fraction of the possibilities.Truly,to believe that the questions
for such a test could be made to be 7.
,
not influenced by one's culture and educational background,is simply wrong.
Tests that are not objective have a real 8.

for harm.It is really doubtful that we should rely heavily upon test results
from a series of questions which are 9.
in
nature.Testing a person's ability to solve 10. 
math problems is a good thing.However,thinking that we can score a person's EQ
is wrong.

There is some argument against the whole idea of developing tests to measure a person's Emotional Intelligence.To suggest that psychologists and educators might be able to 1. a person's worth based on a couple of tests is silly.It is simply 2

calculate

ridiculous

scratch

granted

adapt

account

objective

potential


subjective

complex