英语翻译原文：In the United States,finding aids have evolved throughout the 20th century.In the past several decades,the pace of this evolution has quickened.In this evolution,the information elements within finding aids that facilitate access

英语翻译原文：In the United States,finding aids have evolved throughout the 20th century.In the past several decades,the pace of this evolution has quickened.In this evolution,the information elements within finding aids that facilitate access
英语翻译
原文：In the United States,finding aids have evolved throughout the 20th century.In the past several decades,the pace of this evolution has quickened.In this evolution,the information elements within finding aids that facilitate access (historical or biographical information,scope and contents notes,series descriptions,subject analysis) as well as those that support collection management (accession information,processing attribution,call numbers)have expanded and are now becoming standardized.Still,the creation of finding aids and with it the promise or potential of access is inherently a political act.In order to better understand the underlying social systems behind finding aids,four aspects are explored:creation,construction,components,and consequences.
Creation of finding aids
Several aspects of creation appear to be the most salient.The first is authorship and with it authority.The second is that just as the finding aid as a genre is evolving,individual finding aids themselves evolve and this can be traced through their fluid authorship.Finding aids are dynamic documents.A third point is the relationship between creation and access.The relationship between authorship and authority of finding aids is critical for both archivists and researchers.Many finding aids lack overt attribution.However,this cannot be taken to be an indication that they lack authority.Since they act as both collection management and access tools,finding aids embody several different types of authority.For archivists,the finding aid contains authority control data.For example,the biographical or organizational history note is the authoritative source for quick,summary information on institutional entities and individuals.For researchers,the presence and placement of the finding aid in the archives is an implicit sign of authority.Additionally,for researchers,the finding aid is the most (although not necessarily a good) authoritative source of knowledge about a collection.Are finding aids worthy of this vesting of authority?Exactly what is the nature of this authority?

英语翻译原文：In the United States,finding aids have evolved throughout the 20th century.In the past several decades,the pace of this evolution has quickened.In this evolution,the information elements within finding aids that facilitate access
在美国,寻找艾滋病已演变整个20世纪.在过去几十年中,要加快这一演变的步伐.在这一演变,信息分子,发现艾滋病感染者,方便（历史或履历资料,范围和内容,笔记,系列说明,但须分析） ,以及那些支持征收管理（加入信息,加工归属,呼叫号码）扩大并正成为规范化的轨道.还有,创造寻找艾滋病和与它许诺或潜在的进入本来就是政治行为.为了更好地了解背后的社会制度背后找到艾滋病,从四个方面探索：建立,建设,配件,以及后果.
创作寻找艾滋病
几方面的创作似乎是最突出的.首先是作者和与它权力.第二个是,就如找到援助作为体裁,是不断变化的,个别找到艾滋病本身演变,这可以追溯到通过其流体著作权的.寻找艾滋病是动态文件.第三点之间的关系,是创造和获取.之间的关系,作者身份和权威的检索工具,是至关重要的两个档案工作者和研究者.许多寻找艾滋病缺乏显性的归属.不过,这不能被视为一个迹象表明他们缺乏权威.由于他们的行为都征收管理和访问工具,寻找艾滋病体现了几种不同类型的权威.对于档案,寻找援助包含权限控制数据.举例来说,传记或组织的历史上值得注意的是,权威消息透露,为快速,简易信息机构实体和个人.对研究人员,在场的和安置的寻找援助在档案中,是一种隐签署的授权.此外,对于研究人员,找到援助是大多数（虽然不一定是一个好的）权威人士的知识收藏.发现艾滋病无愧于这个归属的权力?究竟是什么性质,这种权力?